Coleman-Clark Grocery Co. v. Covington Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting application of nullum tempus to claim brought by town against the gas utility because the interest was not one affecting the citizens of the state as “any recovery will inure solely to the benefit of the Town and perhaps it citizens”
• “[A] request for leave to amend almost as an aside, to the district court in a memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss is . . . not a motion to amend.” (internal quotation and citation omitted)
• “[A] request for leave to amend almost as an aside, to the district court in a memorandum 19 in opposition to the defendant’s motion to dismiss is . . . not a motion to amend.” (quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).