COLEMAN, CHRISTOPHER TYE v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that questions regarding the legality of the sentence questions “are not waivable and may be raised sua sponte on direct review by this Court” (citation omitted and formatting altered)
• noting that questions regarding the legality of the sentence questions “are not waivable and may be raised sua sponte on direct review by this Court” (citation omitted and formatting altered)
• noting that questions regarding the legality of the sentence questions “are not waivable and may be raised sua sponte on direct review by this Court” (citation omitted and formatting altered)
• noting that questions regarding the legality of the sentence questions “are not waivable and may be raised sua sponte on direct review by this Court” (citation omitted and formatting altered)
• noting that questions regarding the legality of the sentence questions “are not waivable and may be raised sua sponte on direct review by this Court” (citation omitted and formatting altered)
• explaining that issues related to the trial court’s statutory authority to impose a sentence of restitution implicates the legality of the sentence, which cannot be waived and may be raised by this Court sua sponte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).