District of Columbia· 3/25/2022
Colella v. Androus
Judges: Judge Rudolph Contreras
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 1,521×
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 738×
- United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District of Columbia· 2000-09-28· cited 231×
- Kim v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2011-01-21· cited 150×
- Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-02-06· cited 108×
- United States v. HumphreyFifth Circuit· 1993-11-12· cited 61×
- Campbell v. MaganaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-09-22· cited 55×
- Dalo v. KivitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-07· cited 49×
- Lewis v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2011-04-15· cited 49×
- Whiteaker v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 1986-02-19· cited 42×
- Biomet Inc. v. Finnegan Henderson LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-03-19· cited 41×
- Mills v. CooterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-08-11· cited 39×
- Thompson v. HalvonikCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-07-07· cited 34×
- Alberts v. Tuft (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp. I)District of Columbia· 2006-09-26· cited 32×
- Grayson Consulting, Inc v. Wachovia Securities, LLC (In Re Derivium Capital LLC)Fourth Circuit· 2013-05-24· cited 30×
- MacKtal v. GardeDistrict of Columbia· 2000-07-18· cited 24×
- District of Columbia v. ZukerbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-08-11· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.