Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 7/11/2007

Cole v. State

Citations

2007 OK CR 27
164 P.3d 1089
2007 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 27
2007 WL 1989621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that neither “[Cole’s] trial [n]or sentencing” was “rendered unfair” “or when all of the examples [we]re considered together”
finding that neither “[Cole’s] trial [n]or sentencing” was “rendered unfair” “or when all of the examples [we]re considered together”
finding that neither “[Cole’s] trial [n]or sentencing” was “rendered unfair” “or when all of the examples [we]re considered together”
upholding on habeas review the finding of the heinous, atrocious or cruel aggravator on these facts
upholding on habeas review the finding of the heinous, atrocious or cruel aggravator on these facts
“We think two of these shots, rather than three, would have sufficed, given that Appellant admitted being the cause.”; “State’s Exhibit 8 was fairly redundant as to the injuries and gruesomeness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumpkin, Johnson, Chapel, Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.