· 2/24/2011
Cole v. Milwaukee Area Technical College District
Citations
- 634 F.3d 901
- 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1688
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3623
- 2011 WL 650715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]n any due process case where the deprivation of property is alleged, the threshold question is whether a protected property interest actually exists.”
- “[I]n any due process case where the deprivation of property is alleged, the threshold question is whether a protected property interest actually exists.”
- “The consideration of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion is restricted to the pleadings, which consist here of the complaint, any exhibits attached thereto, and the supporting briefs.”
- “To have a protectable 18 No. 20-1868 property interest in a benefit … a plaintiff must have more than an ‘abstract need or desire for it’ and more than a ‘uni- lateral expectation of it.’” (quoting Roth, 408 U.S. at 577)
- “To have a protectable 18 No. 20-1868 property interest in a benefit … a plaintiff must have more than an ‘abstract need or desire for it’ and more than a ‘uni- lateral expectation of it.’” (quoting Roth, 408 U.S. at 577)
- “To have a protectable 18 No. 20-1868 property interest in a benefit … a plaintiff must have more than an ‘abstract need or desire for it’ and more than a ‘uni- lateral expectation of it.’” (quoting Roth, 408 U.S. at 577)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Wood, McCuskey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.