Cole v. Lutz & Sheinkman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restrictive covenant which ran with land and which was binding on developer and purchasers until January 1, 2000, was valid
• annual property charge for maintenance and other public purposes was valid and duration of the agreement was not indefinite; no restraint on alienation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).