Skip to main content
· 1/5/1885

Cole v. La Grange

Citations

  • 113 U.S. 1
  • 5 S. Ct. 416
  • 28 L. Ed. 896
  • 1885 U.S. LEXIS 1645

Syllabus

<p>The general grant of legislative power in the Constitution of a State does not authorize the legislature, in the ecxerise either of the right of eminent domain, or of the right of taxation, to take private property, without the owner’s consent, for any but a public object. •</p> <p>The .legislature of Missouri has no constitutional bower to authorize a city to issue its bonds by way of donation to a private manufacturing corporation.</p>

About this case

Jump to content

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Cole v. La Grange )

1885 United States Supreme Court case

Cole v. City of La Grange, 113 U.S. 1 (1885), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the general grant of legislative power in a state constitution only enables the legislature to use eminent domain or taxation to take private property, without the owner's consent, for a public purpose.[1] [2] [3]

Background

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cole_v._City_of_La_Grange&action=edit&section=1 "Edit section: Background")
]

The city of La Grange attempted to use eminent domain to condemn property for the benefit of La Grange Iron and Steel Company to expand that served no public benefit.

Decision

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cole_v._City_of_La_Grange&action=edit&section=2 "Edit section: Decision")
]

The Court held that the Missouri legislature could not authorize La Grange to issue bonds to assist corporations in their private business.

Citation in future cases

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cole_v._City_of_La_Grange&action=edit&section=3 "Edit section: Citation in future cases")
]

The case was cited in the dissenting opinion of Justice Thomas in _Kelo v. City of New London _, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).

References

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cole_v._City_of_La_Grange&action=edit&section=4 "Edit section: References")
]

  1. Syllabus of Cole v. City of La Grange, 113 U.S. 1 (1885). This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  2. Paul W. Tschetter, Kelo v. New London: A Divided Court Affirms the Rational Basis Standard of Review in Evaluating Local Determinations of Public Use, 51 S.D. L. Rev. 193, 216 n.166 (2006).
  3. Charles J. Fain, The Use of the Power of Eminent Domain by Missouri Electric Cooperatives, 17 Mo. L. Rev. 159 (April 1952).

External links

[(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cole_v._City_of_La_Grange&action=edit&section=5 "Edit section: External links")
]

United States Fifth Amendment case law

United States Fifth Amendment criminal procedure case law

Double Jeopardy Clause

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cole_v._City_of_La_Grange&oldid=1361597603 "

Categories :

Hidden categories:

Search

Search

Cole v. City of La Grange

Add languages Add topic

Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting same language in the Missouri Public Use Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.