Cole v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the plaintiff’s stipulation as “Kentucky law prevents the plaintiff from pleading an unliquidated amount in controversy with any degree of specificity.”
• It is a federal court’s “responsibility[] to make an independent subject matter jurisdictional determination rather than rely solely on a conclusory assertion of the defendant.”
• allegations in notice of removal taken at face value
• ambiguous demands may be subject to post-removal clarification
• ambiguous demands may be subject to post-removal clarification
• ambiguous demands may be subject to post-removal clarification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).