Skip to main content
· 9/1/2005

Cole v. Doe 1 Thru 2 Officers of Emeryville Police Department

Citations

  • 387 F. Supp. 2d 1084
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25648
  • 2005 WL 2122051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting narrow interpretation of the footnote because “the Ninth Circuit’s 22 focus in Nonnette was on the availability of the habeas remedy,” not on the form of the underlying 23 claims
  • rejecting narrow interpretation of the footnote because “the Ninth Circuit’s 15 focus in Nonnette was on the availability of the habeas remedy,” not on the form of the underlying 16 claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.