Cole v. Cole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• husband and wife owned property as joint tenants but agreed as part of their divorce proceedings that one party would have exclusive possession of the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shackelton v. Sherrard
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1963-09-17· cited 39×
• Grothe v. Cortlandt Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-12-22· cited 24×
• Santoro v. Carbone
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-01-06· cited 17×
• State Ex Rel. Tax Commissioner v. Tuchscherer
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1964-10-15· cited 13×
• Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Kartsone
  C.D. California· 1981-03-25· cited 6×
• Sanders v. Sanders
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2010-06-15· cited 6×
• County of Fresno v. Kahn
  California Court of Appeal· 1962-08-29· cited 5×
• Compton v. Compton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-01-23· cited 2×
• Taylor v. Taylor
  California Court of Appeal· 1961-12-12· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rauer's Collection Co. v. Higgins
  California Court of Appeal· 1948-08-20· cited 54×
• Swartzbaugh v. Sampson
  California Court of Appeal· 1936-01-27· cited 52×
• Hammond v. McArthur
  California Supreme Court· 1947-08-05· cited 46×
• Fish v. Security-First National Bank
  California Supreme Court· 1948-02-03· cited 46×
• Wallace v. Riley
  California Court of Appeal· 1937-11-29· cited 34×
• Estate of Zaring
  California Court of Appeal· 1949-09-13· cited 21×
• Nichols v. Dando
  California Court of Appeal· 1940-02-19· cited 18×
• Edwards v. Edwards
  California Court of Appeal· 1949-02-08· cited 14×
• Gillette v. Nicolls
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-11-06· cited 7×
• Jamison v. Graham
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1870-09-15· cited 7×