Cole v. Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the failure to substitute the successor in interest as the plaintiff did not change the fact that the plaintiff still had to prove his case, and the defendant had a full and fair hearing to present its defense
• discussing Pa.R.C.P. 2004, which govern transfers in interest that occur after an action is commenced
• finding that the general rule that all actions shall be prosecuted by and in the name of the real party in interest shall not be mandatory where a subrogee is a real party in interest; where there is no evidence of a subrogation agreement, none will be presumed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).