· 12/5/2011
Cole v. Boy Scouts of America
Citations
- 725 S.E.2d 476
- 397 S.C. 247
- 2011 WL 6029885
- 2011 S.C. LEXIS 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[a]bsent a legally recognized duty, the defendant in a negligence action is entitled to a judgment as matter of law”
- holding that under the doctrine of primary implied assumption of the risk, the defendant did not owe a duty to the plaintiff who was injured while playing recreation league softball
- applying assumption of risk and granting summary judgment regarding injury in softball game in action brought against baserunner and sponsors of the game
- \Primary implied assumption of risk arises when the plaintiff impliedly assumes those risks that are inherent in a particular activity.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- \The doctrine of primary implied assumption of risk goes to the initial determination of whether the defendant's legal duty encompasses the risk encountered by the plaintiff.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- \A motion for summary judgment on the basis of the absence of a duty is a question of law for the court to determine.\ (quoting Oblachinski v. Reynolds, 391 S.C. 557, 560, 706 S.E.2d 844, 845 (2011))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hearn, Toal, Beatty, Kittredge, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.