Cole Chemical & Distributing, Inc. v. Gowing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion when the trial court awarded less 17 attorney’s fees than the range testified to by both parties’ experts and rejecting argument that “the trial court was bound by the scope of the expert testimony”
• “We need not determine whether the trial court erred in finding that Cole did 17 not make reasonable efforts to mitigate because we conclude that even assuming Cole’s efforts were inadequate, Gowing failed to prove the amount of damages that could have been avoided if Cole had mitigated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).