Coldwell v. Davidson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[b]ecause the Officer did not intend to intend to seize the [plaintiff], there is no Fourth Amendment violation that can provide the basis for a § 1983 claim.”
• finding that the allegations of police officers maintaining a chase “at a high rate of speed through a residential neighborhood at 7 p.m.” did not shock the conscience

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).