Coldiron v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a New York-based advertising agency was subject to jurisdiction in California because they knew that the copyright holder was in California, had contact with California and infringed upon the copyright anyway
• “The same kind of [copyright] preemption principle applies for federal Lanham Act causes of action as for state and common-law causes of action.”
• false association claim based on “dance lift” barred by Dastar

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).