Skip to main content
· 11/5/2009

Cold War Museum, Inc. v. Cold War Air Museum, Inc.

Citations

  • 586 F.3d 1352
  • 92 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1626
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24470
  • 2009 WL 3644936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing how file history for involved application is automatically of record
  • petitioner in a cancellation proceeding bears the burden of proof and must overcome the registration's presumption of validity by a preponderance of the evidence
  • “an applicant’s reliance on Section 2(f) during prosecution presumes that the mark is descriptive.”
  • “an applicant’s reliance on Section 2(f) during prosecution presumes that the mark is descriptive”
  • “Where an applicant seeks registration on the basis of Section 2(f), the mark’s descriptiveness is a nonissue; an applicant’s reliance on Section 2(f) during prosecution presumes that the mark is descriptive.”
  • “where an applicant seeks registration on the basis of Section 2(f), the mark’s descriptiveness is a nonissue; an applicant’s reliance on Section 2(f) during prosecution presumes that the mark is descriptive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Linn, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.