Cold Metal Process Co. v. McLouth Steel Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that double jeopardy claim justified pretrial federal habeas intervention because the claimed constitutional right would be violated if petitioner went to trial
• concluding that double jeopardy claim justified pretrial federal habeas intervention because a claimed constitutional right would be violated if petitioner went to trial
• finding that a double jeopardy claim justified pretrial federal habeas intervention because the constitutional right claimed would be violated if petitioner went to trial
• observing that a petitioner asserting a double jeopardy claim could be entitled to pretrial habeas intervention because the “very constitutional right claimed . . . would be violated if he were compelled to raise his double jeopardy claim after the second trial”
• double jeopardy claim justified pretrial federal habeas intervention, because constitutional right claimed would be violated if petitioner went to trial
• double jeopardy claim justified pretrial federal habeas intervention because constitutional right claimed would be violated if petitioner went to trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).