Skip to main content
· 10/22/1999

Colbert v. Rolls

Citations

  • 746 So. 2d 1134
  • 1999 WL 960859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In this case, the primary issue is one of relevancy, not privacy, and appellate courts in certiorari 8 proceedings are reluctant to review relevancy issues by certiorari.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.