Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 8/17/1999

Colayong v. West

Citations

  • 12 Vet. App. 524
  • 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 885
  • 1999 WL 619405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that VA erred because the nature of its questions suggested an answer and impermissibly narrowed the examiner's field of inquiry
  • holding that the RO's request to a VA medical examiner to \feel free to refute the private physician's report\ was fatally flawed and compromised the fairness of the adjudication process
  • holding that VA's solicitation of a medical opinion from an orthopedic specialist suggesting that the specialist refute a private physician's report was improper and compromised the fairness of the adjudication process
  • VA's instruction that an examiner was free to refute a positive linkage opinion compromised the fairness of the adjudication process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holdaway, Nebeker, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.