Skip to main content
· 7/18/2000

Colaw v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 531 S.E.2d 31
  • 32 Va. App. 806
  • 2000 Va. App. LEXIS 510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing a search warrant - 11 - issued based on conclusory allegations
  • “Only by blindly accepting the informant’s conclusory statement could one believe that drugs would be at the residence.”
  • “A police officer could not reasonably have believed that the warrant was properly issued when it was based on a ‘bare bones’ affidavit that contained only conclusory assertions by a third-party informant about a future event without supporting facts to constitute probable cause.”
  • \A police officer could not reasonably have believed that the warrant was properly issued when it was based on a `bare bones' affidavit that contained only conclusory assertions by a third-party informant about a future event without supporting facts to constitute probable cause.\
  • “A police officer could not reasonably have believed that the warrant was properly issued when it was based on a ‘bare bones’ affidavit that contained only conclusory assertions by a third-party informant about a future event without supporting facts to constitute probable cause.”
  • “A police officer could not reasonably have believed that the warrant was properly issued when it was based on a ‘bare bones’ affidavit that contained only conclusory assertions by a third-party informant about a future event without supporting facts to constitute probable cause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.