Colantuono v. Hockeborn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a hearing officer’s alleged denial of a witness was harmless where the plaintiff had “not alleged what [the witness] would have testified about, much less what the substance of [the witness’s] testimony would have been, or how it would have helped [the] plaintiff”
• \Plaintiff must show that the outcome of the hearing likely would have been different had [the witnesses] been called.\
• \Plaintiff must show that the outcome of the hearing likely would have been different had [the witnesses] been called.\
• “[T]o establish a procedural due process claim in connection with a prison disciplinary hearing, an inmate must show that he was prejudiced by the alleged procedural errors, in the sense that the errors affected the outcome of the hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).