Skip to main content
· 5/1/1975

Coker v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Citations

  • 524 S.W.2d 570
  • 1975 Tex. App. LEXIS 2677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that after boundaries were changed such that a dry territory was included in a wet territory, dry territory retained its status despite subsequent wet vote by entire new subdivision because Texas constitution so provided
  • \We conclude that [the constitutional and statutory provisions] give priority to [the vote of] the smaller subdivision. . . .\
  • \We conclude that [the constitutional and statutory provisions] give priority to [the vote of] the smaller subdivision ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guittard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.