Cok v. Cok

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff's argument that state family court lost jurisdiction due to her removal to federal court was completely without merit where she was a plaintiff in the proceedings and she reversed the state court eaption to qualify as a defendant before the federal court
• although state court proceedings after removal and prior to remand are generally void, where removal was deceptive and “without the slightest color of right or merit,” subsequent state proceedings are not void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McDonald v. Zions First National Bank, N.A.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-03-12· cited 707×
• Attig v. Attig
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-08-26· cited 6×
• Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n/Fidelity New York FSB v. Lane
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-07-07· cited 5×
• Cok v. Forte
  D. Rhode Island· 1995-02-03· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cavanagh v. Cavanagh
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1977-12-02· cited 15×
• Cok v. Cok
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1987-11-17· cited 5×