Skip to main content
· 4/11/1986

Coin Call, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Citations

  • 636 F. Supp. 608
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in antitrust case challenging defendant’s refusal under its tariff to permit resale of telephone services, court would apply state action doctrine, rather than Burford abstention doctrine, to determine whether antitrust laws inappropriately interfered with state regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shoob

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.