Cohesive Technologies v. Waters Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that trial judge has no obligation “to decide forthwith the legal issue of first impression advanced by the movant”
• explaining that denial of motion is appropriate where movant “fails to show that no responsive legal theory will be available to the opposing party, along with facts to support that theory, to defeat the asserted entitlement to summary judgment”
• similar reasoning at summary judgment stage
• similar reasoning at summary judgment stage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).