COHENS, JOSEPH A., PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a law did not facially discriminate because it discriminated “against fuels based on lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions, not state of origin”
• concluding the “district court did not err in finding that the statements made by Oregon public officials cited in [plaintiff’s] complaint do not 28 demonstrate that the objectives identified by the legislature were not the true goals of the Program.”
• “Air pollution prevention falls under the broad police powers of the states, which include the power to protect the health of citizens in the state.” (quotation marks omitted)
• no Commerce Clause violation in Oregon fuel carbon tax scheme because, \the Program does not require or even incentivize an out-of-state operator to become a resident in order to compete on equal terms.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).