· 5/3/2002
Cohen v. TIC Financial Systems (In Re Ampace Corp.)
Citations
- 279 B.R. 145
- 48 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1343
- 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 435
- 2002 WL 999316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] subsequent action is not barred by a prior confirmation hearing under the doctrine of res judicata where the disclosure statement and plan contain a general reservation of the right to pursue preference actions post-confirmation.” (emphasis in original)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peter J. Walsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.