Skip to main content
· 5/3/2002

Cohen v. TIC Financial Systems (In Re Ampace Corp.)

Citations

  • 279 B.R. 145
  • 48 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1343
  • 2002 Bankr. LEXIS 435
  • 2002 WL 999316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] subsequent action is not barred by a prior confirmation hearing under the doctrine of res judicata where the disclosure statement and plan contain a general reservation of the right to pursue preference actions post-confirmation.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peter J. Walsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.