Skip to main content
· 5/8/1996

Cohen v. Pollack

Citations

  • 674 So. 2d 805
  • 1996 WL 229122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding reversible error based upon the cumulative effect of counsel's improper argument that the jury should measure damages by considering pain that the plaintiff endured, and counsel's statements indicating his opinions and beliefs regarding the case
  • an attorney's personal beliefs or feelings about the case are irrelevant and constitute reversible error
  • whether facial scar is disfigurement is jury question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Levy, and Gersten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.