Skip to main content
· 8/1/1909

Cohen v. Minzesheimer

Citations

  • 118 N.Y.S. 385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a Rule 56(d) declaration filed in addition to a substantive response was not validly before the court
  • they should be given notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.