Cohen v. Menard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While the [assignment] 20 documents and related information were material to patent ownership, they were not even 21 arguably ‘material to patentability. Therefore, the district court’s finding of an exceptional 22 case cannot rest on a finding of inequitable conduct.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).