Cohen v. McDonald's Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiffs cause of action was preempted because it essentially asked the court “to fill holes in” the National Labeling and Education Act, 21 U.S.C. § 341 et seq., when the FDA had yet to do so
• stating that the determination of subject matter jurisdiction is focused on the nature of the case and the relief sought
• “A motion to dismiss under section 2 — 615 of the Code tests the legal sufficiency of a pleading”
• grant of section 2-619.1 combined motion to dismiss is reviewed de novo
• grant of section 2 — 619.1 combined motion to dismiss is reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).