· 7/29/2003
Cohen v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB
Citations
- 273 F. Supp. 2d 524
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12963
- 2003 WL 21756068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that broad supportive statements “cannot be construed as clear and unambiguous promises”
- granting summary judgment; loan application specifically stated that it was “not a commitment to lend”
- potential lender’s statement that the parties would “work through” the issues not a clear and unambiguous promise to make a loan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Preska
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.