Skip to main content
· 7/29/2003

Cohen v. Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB

Citations

  • 273 F. Supp. 2d 524
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12963
  • 2003 WL 21756068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that broad supportive statements “cannot be construed as clear and unambiguous promises”
  • granting summary judgment; loan application specifically stated that it was “not a commitment to lend”
  • potential lender’s statement that the parties would “work through” the issues not a clear and unambiguous promise to make a loan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Preska

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.