Skip to main content
· 4/30/2003

Cohen v. Kravit Estate Buyers, Inc.

Citations

  • 843 So. 2d 989
  • 2003 WL 1969098

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining “summary judgment is rarely proper” in cases that turn on “circumstantial evidence of intent and knowledge”
  • reversing summary judgment due to genuine issues of material fact in existence
  • “In fraud cases, summary judgment is rarely proper as the issue so frequently turns on the' axis of the circumstances surrounding the complete transaction, including circumstantial evidence of intent and knowledge.” (citation omitted)
  • issues, including intent, frequently require circumstantial evidence of intent and knowledge
  • “No property interest is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.