Skip to main content
· 10/12/1988

Cohen v. Hoard

Citations

  • 696 F. Supp. 564
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11345
  • 1988 WL 106430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying bright-line rule that once a defendant 23 has been served, the nonservice exception no longer applies
  • “Removal statutes are strictly construed to limit the federal court’s authority to that expressly provided by Congress and to protect the states’ judicial powers.” (citations omitted)
  • “Removal statutes are strictly construed to limit the federal court’s authority to that expressly provided by Congress and to protect the states’ judicial powers.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.