· 10/12/1988
Cohen v. Hoard
Citations
- 696 F. Supp. 564
- 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11345
- 1988 WL 106430
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying bright-line rule that once a defendant 23 has been served, the nonservice exception no longer applies
- “Removal statutes are strictly construed to limit the federal court’s authority to that expressly provided by Congress and to protect the states’ judicial powers.” (citations omitted)
- “Removal statutes are strictly construed to limit the federal court’s authority to that expressly provided by Congress and to protect the states’ judicial powers.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.