Cohen v. Garelick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in the context of a dispute over which parcels were covered by an agreement, that “if there was an ambiguity, the statute [of frauds] did not bar reference to the circumstances to resolve it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blackstone Realty LLC v. Federal Deposit Insurance
  First Circuit· 2001-04-03· cited 149×
• Jones v. Gingras
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1975-07-29· cited 25×
• Coyle v. Swanson
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1962-11-07· cited 15×
• Bridge Enterprises, Inc. v. Futurity Thread Co.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1974-05-09· cited 6×
• Hook Brown Co. v. Farnsworth Press, Inc.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1965-01-05· cited 6×
• Bennett v. Papetsas
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1978-08-30· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mead v. Parker
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1874-09-04· cited 77×
• Michelson v. Sherman
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1942-02-02· cited 42×
• Bowser v. Chalifour
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1956-06-27· cited 36×
• Jennings v. Puffer
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-11-22· cited 32×
• Deyo v. Athol Housing Authority
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1957-02-13· cited 16×
• LaCouture v. Renaud
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1949-11-10· cited 12×
• Buckley v. Gray
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1934-01-02· cited 4×