Skip to main content
· 11/21/1895

Cohen v. Drake

Citations

  • 13 Wash. 102
  • 42 P. 529
  • 1895 Wash. LEXIS 56

Syllabus

<p>MISCONDUCT OF COUNSEL — REFERENCE IN ARGUMENT TO MATTERS NOT IN EVIDENCE.</p> <p>Where counsel in argument to a jury exhibits paid checks of his client, which had not been introduced in evidence, and refers thereto for the purpose 'of refreshing his recollection as to dates and amounts, it is error for the court to refuse a request for an instruction to the jury to disregard counsel’s argument in regard to them.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.