Skip to main content
· 5/24/2007

Cohen Ex Rel. Friedman's Creditor Trust v. Ernst & Young, LLP (In Re Friedman's, Inc.)

Citations

  • 372 B.R. 530
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2810
  • 48 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 181
  • 2007 WL 2362951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the McMahon test to debtor-derived claims but not Code-derived creditor claims it concluded were not arbitrable
  • rejecting argument that fraudulent conveyance claims should be treated as breach of contract or malpractice claims for purposes of compelling arbitration
  • rejecting argument that fraudulent conveyance claims should be treated as breach of contract or malpractice claims for purposes of compelling arbitration
  • applying the McMahon test to debtor-derived claims but not Code-derived creditor claims it concluded were not arbitrable
  • finding the debtor-in-possession’s avoidance actions under §§ 544(b) and 548 were “Code-derived creditor claims and not arbitrable” because it was “not a successor-party to a debtor’s pre-petition arbitration agreements.”
  • finding the debtor-in-possession’s avoidance actions under §§ 544(b) and 548 were “Code-derived creditor claims and not arbitrable” because it was “not a successor-party to a debtor’s pre-petition arbitration agreements.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.