Skip to main content
· 3/17/1978

Cohane v. Arpeja-California, Inc.

Citations

  • 385 A.2d 153
  • 1978 D.C. App. LEXIS 448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim for sales commissions, some of which based on District transactions, sufficiently related for jurisdiction
  • claim for sales commissions, some of which based on District transactions, sufficiently related for jurisdiction
  • reversing order granting motion made after trial had begun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Yeagley, Mack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.