Cogswell v. Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that consulting doctor’s involvement in patient’s care was a disputed question of fact “especially in light of [the consulting doctor’s] expertise in the field of ophthalmology and [the primary doctor’s] lack of expertise in this area”
• concluding that consulting doctor's involvement in patient's care was a disputed question of fact \especially in light of [the consulting doctor's] expertise in the field of ophthalmology and [the primary doctor's] lack of expertise in this area\
• taking into account the totality of the record, there was a factual question whether the consultant had a duty to the patient “especially in light of [his] expertise in the field” and the emergency room physician’s lack of expertise
• taking into account the totality of the record, there was a factual question whether the consultant had a duty to the patient \especially in light of [his] expertise in the field\ and the emergency room physician's lack of expertise
• existence of physician-patient relationship is question of fact for the jury
• existence of physician-patient relationship is question of fact for the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas v. Hermoso
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-10-23· cited 244×
• Irvin Ex Rel. Irvin v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2001-09-21· cited 39×
• Lam v. GLOBAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., PS
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-23· cited 36×
• Khung Thi Lam v. Global Medical Systems, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-23· cited 35×
• Kelley v. Middle Tennessee Emergency Physicians, P.C.
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2004-04-23· cited 32×
• Gilbert v. Miodovnik
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-03-18· cited 24×
• Campbell v. Haber
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-07-07· cited 16×
• Mead v. Legacy Health System
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-07-26· cited 16×
• Raptis-Smith v. St. Joseph's Medical Center
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-02-18· cited 13×
• Marshall v. Rosenberg
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2021-07-01· cited 12×
• Santos v. Rosing
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2009-03-17· cited 8×
• Rogers v. Maloney
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2010-10-01· cited 6×
• Tom v. Sundaresan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2013-06-11· cited 6×
• Lawliss v. Quellman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-03-22· cited 2×
• von Ohlen v. Piskacek
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-11-20· cited 2×
• Quirk v. Zuckerman
  New York Supreme Court· 2003-06-30

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alvarez v. Prospect Hospital
  New York Court of Appeals· 1986-11-11· cited 8,793×
• Lee v. City of New York
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-10-09· cited 45×
• Sawh v. Schoen
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-05-23· cited 33×
• Heller v. Peekskill Community Hospital
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-11-08· cited 29×
• Bienz v. Central Suffolk Hospital
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1990-07-02· cited 18×
• Lipton v. Kaye
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-04-04· cited 15×
• Miller v. Sullivan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-04-13· cited 9×