Cognex Corp. v. Lemelson Medical, Education & Research Foundation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s licenses, which, like the licenses here, did not impose obligations to prosecute infringement, had only a de minimis connection with the infringement notices sent to the plaintiff
• where court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant, it was “unnecessary to address the remaining issues raised in [the defendant’s] motion to dismiss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).