Coglan v. Beard
Citations
- 65 Cal. 58
- 2 P. 737
- 1884 Cal. LEXIS 441
Syllabus
<p>Office—Contested Election—Evidence—Bubden of Pboof. — In an action to contest the right of a party to an office to which he has been declared elected, the returns of the election boards should be received as prima facie true. In order to overcome this evidence by a recount of the ballots cast at the election, the contestant must affirmatively prove that the ballots have not been tampered with, and that they remained in the same condition as they were when delivered to the proper custody by the judges of election. If it appear to the satisfaction of the court that the ballots have not been tampered with, it should adopt the result as shown by the recount, and not as returned by the election board.</p> <p>Findings—Ultimate Facts.—Findings should be of the ultimate facts put in issue by the pleadings, and should not be argumentative.</p>
Judges: McKinstry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-09-02· cited 49×
- Hunt v. CampbellArizona Supreme Court· 1917-12-22· cited 30×
- Davenport v. OlerichSupreme Court of Iowa· 1897-12-18· cited 24×
- Quigley v. PhelpsWashington Supreme Court· 1913-06-10· cited 19×
- Coglan v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1885-08-18· cited 16×
- Fishback v. BramelWyoming Supreme Court· 1896-04-27· cited 10×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.