Skip to main content
· 4/9/1904

Coghlan v. Williams

Citations

  • 69 Kan. 144
  • 76 P. 394
  • 1904 Kan. LEXIS 224

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Practice, Supreme Court — Constitutional Question, if Any, Held Waived. Where, for the purpose of conferring jurisdiction, the trial judge certifies that a constitutional question is involved in proceedings in error commenced in this court, and n<* reference is made in the oral argument or in the brief of plaintiff in error to anything of the kind, and no such question is involved in any of the matters argued in this court, it will be assumed that, if there be a constitutional question in the case, it has been waived.</p> <p>2. -- When a Constitutional Question Only will be Reviewed. When the amount in controversy is such that this court has no jurisdiction to review the proceedings of the lower court, but there is attached to the case-made a certificate of the trial judge that there is a constitutional question involved, this court will not review any other question in the case.</p>

Judges: Greene

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.