Coghlan v. Wellcraft Marine Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court acted prematurely by dismissing case on the pleadings
• holding that district court acted prematurely by dismissing case on the pleadings
• noting that “the no-injury approach to product litigation has been rejected in several recent decisions”
• holding, “[o]ur task is to evaluate each of the Coghlans’ state law claims for the availability of benefit of the bargain relief”
• holding, A [o]ur task is to evaluate each of the Coghlans = state law claims for the availability of benefit of the bargain relief @
• recognizing -that FDUTPA cases apply a “benefit of the bargain” damages formula

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).