District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/29/2009
Coghill v. United States
Citations
- 982 A.2d 802
- 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 544
- 2009 WL 3459874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering the fact that an officer was alone with the suspect in finding handcuffing the suspect reasonable as part of an investigatory stop
- upholding conviction for defendant who forcibly resisted officers as they handcuffed him but reversing conviction for defendant who fled from officers
- the defendant fled a traffic stop, abandoning his companions and their vehicle, after the police had cuffed the driver, who himself had tried to escape by driving the car away from the stop
- the defendant fled a traffic stop, abandoning his companions and their vehicle, after the police had cuffed the driver, who himself had tried to escape by driving the car away from the stop
- the defendant fled a traffic stop, abandoning his companions and their vehicle, after the police had cuffed the driver, who himself had tried to escape by driving the car away from the stop
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washington, Glickman, Ferren
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kyle v. BedlionDistrict of Columbia· 2016-04-01· cited 29×
- Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-31· cited 22×
- Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-09-05· cited 22×
- Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-03-29· cited 17×
- Thurman N. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-11-06· cited 16×
- Buchanan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-12-08· cited 15×
- In re J.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-05-05· cited 12×
- Brian K. Gilliam, John A. Daniels, and Ronald L. English v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-11-21· cited 11×
- Dalton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-01-10· cited 8×
- Xingru Lin v. DC (REDACTED)D.C. Circuit· 2022-09-02· cited 7×
- Dickens v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-05-05· cited 5×
- United States v. Marcel Aparicio-SoriaFourth Circuit· 2013-07-05· cited 4×
- Emero Sanchez Tornero v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-06-22· cited 4×
- Spriggs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 3×
- Gayden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-10-29· cited 2×
- WILLIAM BRIAN FOSTER v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-04-21· cited 1×
- In Re JSDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-05-05
- Jarrell A. Gayden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-02-05
- Wood v. Government of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-05-31
- Bushrod v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2021-02-22
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-12-03· cited 1,353×
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 1,089×
- Sousa v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-03-16· cited 77×
- Hicks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-06-03· cited 33×
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-05-03· cited 25×
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-03-05· cited 20×
- Barkley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-07· cited 19×
- Dolson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-05-29· cited 18×
- In re C.L.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-10-28· cited 18×
- Ransom v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-24· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.