Skip to main content
· 3/22/2010

Coggins v. Tallapoosa County Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 176 L. Ed. 2d 357
  • 2010 U.S. LEXIS 2506
  • 130 S. Ct. 1898
  • 559 U.S. 1000
  • 78 U.S.L.W. 3548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a contract provision limiting a statute of limitations is enforceable so long as it is clear and unambiguous (quotation marks and citations omitted)
  • noting the firmly established principle that under Ohio law, parties to a contract may validly agree to a limitations period different from the state statute of limitations
  • noting the firmly established principle that under Ohio law, parties to a contract may validly agree to a limitations period different from the state statute of limitations
  • acknowledging the “unique factual situation” presented in Kraly and holding that a two-year uninsured/underinsured-motorist policy limitation was reasonable and began running upon the date of the accident involving the uninsured motorist

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.