Coggin v. Coggin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the chancellor, even if this Court disagrees with the findings of fact and would arrive at a different conclusion.” (citing Richardson v. Riley, 355 So. 2d 667, 668 (Miss. 1978))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).