Cogan Properties v. East Union Twp. ZHB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a majority of jurisdictions hold that negative easements “constitute property rights for purposes of eminent domain”
• noting that a majority of jurisdictions hold that negative easements “constitute property rights for purposes of eminent domain”
• building restrictions constitute compensable property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).