Missouri Court of Appeals· 2/27/2007
Coffman v. Coffman
Citations
- 215 S.W.3d 309
- 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 334
- 2007 WL 581458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding spouse’s pension benefits as “a hybrid, containing both a disability and a deferred compensation component”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Patricia Breckenridge, Judge, and Joseph M. Ellis, Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Missouri Prosecuting Attorneys v. Barton CountySupreme Court of Missouri· 2010-03-23· cited 34×
- Coffman v. CoffmanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-12-29· cited 10×
- Marriage of Mahlum and ElderMontana Supreme Court· 2020-04-21· cited 10×
- Blydenburg-Dixon v. DixonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-02-24· cited 9×
- Marriage of Matthew Tait Miller and Karri Ann MillerSupreme Court of Iowa· 2021-11-19
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri· 1976-05-05· cited 7,357×
- In Re Marriage of MichelMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-09-13· cited 32×
- In Re Marriage of MedlockMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-04-20· cited 27×
- Comninellis v. ComninellisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-03-11· cited 23×
- In Re Marriage of ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-30· cited 21×
- In Re Marriage of CranorMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-04-25· cited 14×
- Hall v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-10-28· cited 10×
- Hill v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-01-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.