Coffey v. Minwax Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that objection to “all of the jury instructions read by the [c]ourt proposed by defense, which were not standard jury instructions,” was not specific enough to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 302(b)
• foundation objection waived where the appellant objected at trial, but did not inform the court that the objection was based on a lack of foundation
• “It is well-settled that a party may not raise an argument for the first time on appeal. See Pa.R.A.P. 302. Since appellants failed to raise the precise argument raised on appeal before the trial court, we find the issue to be waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).