Skip to main content
· 3/2/1982

Coffey v. Md. Nat'l Cap. P & P Comm'n

Citations

  • 441 A.2d 1041
  • 293 Md. 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that zoning and subdivision planning “represent separate municipal functions and neither is a mere rubber-stamp for the other”
  • holding that the Commission acted properly in denying a proposed subdivision plan where the subdivision did not comply with the applicable master plan where the subdivision regulations required such compliance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson and Rodowsky, Jj., and J. Dudley Digges, Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals (Retired), Specially Assigned

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.