· 3/2/1982
Coffey v. Md. Nat'l Cap. P & P Comm'n
Citations
- 441 A.2d 1041
- 293 Md. 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that zoning and subdivision planning “represent separate municipal functions and neither is a mere rubber-stamp for the other”
- holding that the Commission acted properly in denying a proposed subdivision plan where the subdivision did not comply with the applicable master plan where the subdivision regulations required such compliance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson and Rodowsky, Jj., and J. Dudley Digges, Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals (Retired), Specially Assigned
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.